|
| |
Antifederalist
No. 6
The Hobgoblins of Anarchy And Dissensions Among
The States |
 |
Antifederalist No. 6One of largest series of Antifederalist essays was penned
under the pseudonym "Centinel." The Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer ran this
24 essay series between October 5, 1787 and November 24, 1788. This selection is from the
eleventh letter of "Centinel," appearing in the Independent Gazetteer on January
16, 1788.
The evils of anarchy have been portrayed with all the imagery of language in the
growing colors of eloquence; the affrighted mind is thence led to clasp the new
Constitution as the instrument of deliverance, as the only avenue to safety and happiness.
To avoid the possible and transitory evils of one extreme, it is seduced into the certain
and permanent misery necessarily attendant on the other. A state of anarchy from its very
nature can never be of long continuance; the greater its violence the shorter the
duration. Order and security are immediately sought by the distracted people beneath the
shelter of equal laws and the salutary restraints of regular government; and if this be
not attainable, absolute power is assumed by the one, or a few, who shall be the most
enterprising and successful. If anarchy, therefore, were the inevitable consequence of
rejecting the new Constitution, it would be infinitely better to incur it, for even then
there would be at least the chance of a good government rising out of licentiousness. But
to rush at once into despotism because there is a bare possibility of anarchy ensuing from
the rejection, or from what is yet more visionary, the small delay that would be
occasioned by a revision and correction of the proposed system of government is so
superlatively weak, so fatally blind, that it is astonishing any person of common
understanding should suffer such an imposition to have the least influence on his
judgment; still more astonishing that so flimsy and deceptive a doctrine should make
converts among the enlightened freemen of America, who have so long enjoyed the blessings
of liberty. But when I view among such converts men otherwise pre-eminent it raises a
blush for the weakness of humanity that these, her brightest ornaments, should be so
dim-sighted to what is self-evident to most men, that such imbecility of judgment should
appear where so much perfection was looked for. This ought to teach us to depend more on
our own judgment and the nature of the case than upon the opinions of the greatest and
best of men, who, from constitutional infirmities or particular situations, may sometimes
view an object through a delusive medium; but the opinions of great men are more
frequently the dictates of ambition or private interest.
The source of the apprehensions of this so much dreaded anarchy would upon investigation
be found to arise from the artful suggestions of designing men, and not from a rational
probability grounded on the actual state of affairs. The least reflection is sufficient to
detect the fallacy to show that there is no one circumstance to justify the prediction of
such an event. On the contrary a short time will evince, to the utter dismay and confusion
of the conspirators, that a perseverance in cramming down their scheme of power upon the
freemen of this State [Pennsylvania] will inevitably produce an anarchy destructive of
their darling domination, and may kindle a flame prejudicial to their safety. They should
be cautious not to trespass too far on the forbearance of freemen when wresting their
dearest concerns, but prudently retreat from the gathering storm.
The other specter that has been raised to terrify and alarm the people out of the exercise
of their judgment on this great occasion, is te dread of our splitting into separate
confederacies or republics, that might become rival powers and consequently liable to
mutual wars from the usual motives of contention. This is an event still more improbable
than the foregoing. It is a presumption unwarranted, either by the situation of affairs,
or the sentiments of the people; no disposition leading to it exists; the advocates of the
new constitution seem to view such a separation with horror, and its opponents are
strenuously contending for a confederation that shall embrace all America under its
comprehensive and salutary protection. This hobgoblin appears to have sprung from the
deranged brain of Publius, [The Federalist] a New York writer, who, mistaking sound for
argument, has with Herculean labor accumulated myriads of unmeaning sentences, and
mechanically endeavored to force conviction by a torrent of misplaced words. He might have
spared his readers the fatigue of wading through his long-winded disquisitions on the
direful effects of the contentions of inimical states, as totally inapplicable to the
subject he was professedly treating; this writer has devoted much time, and wasted more
paper in combating chimeras of his own creation. However, for the sake of argument, I will
admit that the necessary consequence of rejecting or delaying the establishment of the new
constitution would be the dissolution of the union, and the institution of even rival and
inimical republics; yet ought such an apprehension, if well founded, to drive us into the
fangs of despotism? Infinitely preferable would be occasional wars to such an event. The
former, although a severe scourge, is transient in its continuance, and in its operation
partial, but a small proportion of the community are exposed to its greatest horrors, and
yet fewer experience its greatest evils; the latter is permanent and universal misery,
without remission or exemption. As passing clouds obscure for a time the splendor of the
sun, so do wars interrupt the welfare of mankind; but despotism s a settled gloom that
totally extinguishes happiness. Not a ray of comfort can penetrate to cheer the dejected
mind; the goad of power with unabating rigor insists upon the utmost exaction; like a
merciless taskmaster, [it] is continually inflicting the lash, and is never satiated with
the feast of unfeeling domination, or the most abject servility.
The celebrated Lord Kaims, whose disquisitions of human nature evidence extraordinary
strength of judgment and depth of investigation, says that a continual civil war, which is
the most destructive and horrible scene of human discord, is preferable to the uniformity
of wretchedness and misery attendant upon despotism; of all possible evils, as I observed
in my first number, this is the worst and the most to be dreaded.
I congratulate my fellow citizens that a good government, the greatest earthly blessing,
may be so easily obtained, that our circumstances are so favorable, that nothing but the
folly of the conspirators can produce anarchy or civil war, which would presently
terminate in their destruction and the permanent harmony of the state, alone interrupted
by their ambitious machinations.
CENTINEL

|