|
| |
Antifederalist No. 22
Articles of Confederation Simply Requires
Amendments,
Particularly For Commercial Power And Judicial Power;
Constitution Goes Too Far |
 |
Antifederalist No. 22Benjamin Austin of Massachusetts, used the pen-name
"Candidus." Taken from two letters by "Candidus" which appeared in the
[Boston] Independent Chronicle, December 6 and 20, 1787.
.... Many people are sanguine for the Constitution, because they apprehend our commerce
will be benefitted. I would advise those persons to distinguish between the evils that
arise from extraneous causes and our private imprudencies, and those that arise from our
government. It does not appear that the embarrassments of our trade will be removed by the
adoption of this Constitution. The powers of Europe do not lay any extraordinary duties on
our oil, fish, or tobacco, because of our government; neither do they discourage our ship
building on this account. I would ask what motive would induce Britain to repeal the
duties on our oil, or France on our fish, if we should adopt the proposed Constitution?
Those nations laid these duties to promote their own fishery, etc., and let us adopt what
mode of government we please, they will pursue their own politics respecting our imports
and exports, unless we can check them by some commercial regulations.
But it may be said, that such commercial regulations will take place after we have adopted
the Constitution, and that the northern states would then become carriers for the
southern. The great question then is, whether it is necessary in order to obtain these
purposes, for every state to give up their whole power of legislation and taxation, and
become an unwieldy republic, when it is probable the important object of our commerce
could be effected by a uniform navigation act, giving Congress full power to regulate the
whole commerce of the States? This power Congress have often said was sufficient to answer
all their purposes. The circular letter from the Boston merchants and others, was urgent
on this subject. Also the navigation act of this state [Massachusetts], was adopted upon
similar principles, and . . . was declared by our Minister in England, to be the most
effectual plan to promote our navigation, provided it had been adopted by the whole
confederacy.
But it may be said, this regulation of commerce, without energy to enforce a compliance,
is quite ideal. Coercion with some persons seems the principal object, but I believe we
have more to expect from the affections of the people, than from an armed body of men.
Provided a uniform commercial system was adopted, and each State felt its agreeable
operations, we should have but little occasion to exercise force. But however, as power is
thought necessary to raise an army, if required, to carry into effect any federal measure,
I am willing to place it, where it is likely to be used with the utmost caution. This
power I am willing to place among the confederated States, to be exercised when two thirds
of them in their legislative capacities shall say the common good requires it. But to
trust this power in the hands of a few men delegated for two, four and six years, is
complimenting the ambition of human nature too highly, to risk the tranquility of these
States on their absolute determination. Certain characters now on the stage, we have
reason to venerate, but though this country is now blessed with a Washington, Franklin,
Hancock and Adams, yet posterity may have reason to rue the day when their political
welfare depends on the decision of men who may fill the places of these worthies....
The advocates for the Constitution, have always assumed an advantage by saying, that their
opposers have never offered any plan as a substitute; the following outlines are therefore
submitted, not as originating from an individual, but as copied from former resolutions of
Congress, and united with some parts of the Constitution proposed by the respectable
convention. This being the case, I presume it will not be invalidated by the cant term of
antifederalism.
1st. That the Legislature of each state, empower Congress to frame a navigation act, to
operate uniformly throughout the states; receiving to Congress all necessary powers to
regulate our commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the
Indian tribes. The revenue arising from the impost to be subject to their appropriations,
"to enable them to fulfill their public engagements with foreign creditors."
2nd. That the Legislature of each state, instruct their delegates in Congress, to frame a
treaty of AMITY for the purposes of discharging each state's proportion of the public
debt, either foreign or domestic, and to enforce (if necessary) their immediate payment.
Each state obligating themselves in the treaty of amity, to furnish (whenever required by
Congress) a proportionate number of the Militia who are ever to be well organized and
disciplined, for the purposes of repelling any invasion; suppressing any insurrection; or
reducing any delinquent state within the confederacy, to a compliance with the federal
treaty of commerce and amity. Such assistance to be furnished by the Supreme Executive of
each state, on the application of Congress. The troops in cases of invasion to be under
the command of the Supreme Executive of the state immediately in danger; but in cases of
insurrection, and when employed against any delinquent state in the confederacy, the
troops to be under the command of Congress.
3d. That such states as did not join the confederacy of commerce and amity, should be
considered as aliens; and any goods brought from such state into any of the confederated
states, together with their vessels, should be subject to heavy extra duties.
4th. The treaty of amity, agreed to by the several states, should expressly declare that
no State (without the consent of Congress) should enter into any treaty, alliances, or
confederacy; grant letters of marque and reprisal; make anything but gold and silver coin
a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder or ex post facto law, or impair
the obligations of contracts; engage in war, or declare peace.
5th. A Supreme Judicial Court to be constituted for the following federal purposes -- to
extend to all treaties made previous to, or which shall be made under the authority of the
confederacy; all cases affecting Ambassadors, and other public Ministers and Consuls;
controversies between two or more states; and between citizens of the same state claiming
lands under grants of different states; to define and punish piracies, and felonies
committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations.
6th. That it be recommended to Congress, that the said navigation act, and treaty of
amity, be sent to the Legislatures (or people) of the several states, for their assenting
to, and ratifying the same.
7th. A regular statement and account of the receipts and expenditures, of all public
monies, should be published from time to time.
The above plan it is humbly conceived -- secures the internal government of the several
states; promotes the commerce of the whole union; preserves a due degree of energy; lays
restraints on aliens; secures the several states against invasions and insurrection by a
MILITIA, rather than a STANDING ARMY; checks all ex post facto laws; cements the states by
certain federal restrictions; confines the judiciary powers to national matters; and
provides for the public information of receipts and expenditures. In a word, it places us
in a complete federal state.
The resolves of Congress, 18th April, 1783, "recommends to the several States, to
invest them with powers to levy for the use of the United States, certain duties upon
goods, imported from any foreign port, island or plantation;" which measures is
declared by them, "to be a system more free, from well founded exception, and is
better calculated to receive the approbation of the several States, than any other, that
the wisdom of Congress could devise; and if adopted, would enable them to fulfill their
public engagements with their foreign creditors.". . . .
Should we adopt this plan, no extraordinary expenses would arise, and Congress having but
one object to attend, every commercial regulation would be uniformly adopted; the duties
of impost and excise, would operate equally throughout the states; our ship building and
carrying trade, would claim their immediate attention; and in consequence thereof, our
agriculture, trade and manufactures would revive and flourish. No acts of legislation,
independent of this great business, would disaffect one State against the other; but the
whole, . . . in one Federal System of commerce, would serve to remove all local
attachments, and establish our navigation upon a most extensive basis. The powers of
Europe, would be alarmed at our Union, and would fear lest we should retaliate on them by
laying restrictions on their trade....
These states, by the blessing of Heaven, are now in a very tranquil state. This
government, in particular, has produced an instance of ENERGY, in suppressing a late
rebellion, which no absolute monarchy can boast. And notwithstanding the insinuations of a
"small party," who are ever branding the PEOPLE with the most opprobrious
epithets -- representing them as aiming to level all distinctions; emit paper money;
encourage the rebellion -- yet the present General Court, the voice of that body, whom
they have endeavored to stigmatize, have steadily pursued measures foreign from the
suggestions of such revilers. And the public credit has been constantly appreciating since
the present Administration.
Let us then be cautious how we disturb this general harmony. Every exertion is now making,
by the people, to discharge their taxes. Industry and frugality prevail. Our commerce is
every day increasing by the enterprise of our merchants. And above all, the PEOPLE of the
several states are convinced of the necessity of adopting some Federal Commercial Plan....
CANDIDUS

|